Wilhelm Busch und Schopenhauer
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Der junge Wilhelm Griesinger im Spannungsfeld zwischen Philosophie und Physiologie
NICHOLAS RUSSELL, Like engend'ring like: heredity and animal breeding in early modern England, Cambridge University Press, 1986, 8vo, pp. ix, 271, £27.50. Productivity is a difficult thing to evaluate in any walk of life or national context, but there is nevertheless some kind ofagreed consensus among historians that the agrarian revolution in the British Isles turned upon a dramatic increase i...
متن کاملWilhelm Schulthess (1855–1917) und die Schweizer Orthopädie seiner Zeit
title-page and the opening passages of the text, it proves to be an exemplar of al-Samarqandi's Al-Asbab wa-l-'alamat copied in 1099/1687. As other copies of this work and of al-Kirmani's commentary upon it are described in the alphabetical list, this one too should have been included. Ar. 120, also marked as neither used nor identified, comprises eight different essays in different hands on di...
متن کاملCompassion in Schopenhauer and Śāntideva
Although it is well known that Schopenhauer claimed that Buddhism closely reflected his own philosophy, this claim was largely ignored until the mid-late Twentieth century. Most commentators on Schopenhauer (with some recent exceptions) since then have mentioned his Buddhist affinities but have been quite broad and general in their treatment. I feel that any general comparison of Schopenhauer’s...
متن کاملNotes on Schopenhauer and the Natural Sciences
The following notes were prepared in response to criticism of Schopenhauer’s philosophy in a mailing list. The impression given was that the advances of the natural sciences since his death make his work irrelevant to modern science. I for one do not think that this is true. In these notes I do not try to convince the reader otherwise but select few examples of important scientists that were in...
متن کاملSchopenhauer on the Rights of Animals
I argue that Schopenhauer’s ascription of (moral) rights to animals flows naturally from his distinctive analysis of the concept of a right. In contrast to those who regard rights as fundamental and then cast wrongdoing as a matter of violating rights, he takes wrong (Unrecht) to be the more fundamental notion and defines the concept of a right (Recht) in its terms. He then offers an account of...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Neophilologus
سال: 1921
ISSN: 0028-2677,1572-8668
DOI: 10.1007/bf01686099